Space Exploration Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

quad Exploration - Research Paper ExampleThe pen worked and also enjoyed some modest success at a novelty item back here on earth. The Soviet Union, faced with the same problem, employ a pencil.ABSTRACTNASA and its voluminous funding by the US giving medication have been burning questions from solar day one. While the proponents of NASA funding have a firm belief that even a penny invested in its prolific research programs will reap insurmountable benefits for the world and humanity in general, the people who convict NASA and its so-called good for nothing activities have a strong contention that that the profusion of funds that NASA uses ar neither worth it nor overhaulable for mankind. In this research paper we try to analyse both sides of the origin and try to reach a conclusion as to why the US government should work to increase the funding of NASA programs, and what should be the role of NASA administration in this regard.NASA AND ITS PROJECT HISTORYIn the period start ing from 1958 till 2008, the total spending on NASA has been $471.23 billion dollars, which makes an average of $9.06 billion per year. NASAs budget for FY 2008 sums up to $17.318 billion, which is around 0.6% of the $2.9 trillion United States federal budget for the year, and almost about 35% total academic scientific research spending in the United States. These figures might look huge but the point of experimental condition is that they have enabled NASA to provide humanity with some emphatic developments and research successes. The most prominent discoveries and developments of NASA are the lead up 10, Voyager 1 and 2, Hubble Telescope, Space Shuttle Program, Apollo 13, Mars Pathfinder, and Moon Landing. These benchmarks have proved that the funding provided to the agency was richly utilized for productive purposes. These days there is a contention about whether NASA would be able to halt out on its latest Constellation Program that aims at retiring the space shuttle this y ear, substitution it Orion (capsule- based vehicles), and luner landers and Space Launch System, etc. But all these prospects rest on the unbiased debate that whether the amount being spent in this area is really worth it, especially when American debt is making life tougher for the Finance Ministry day in and day out. THE DARK SIDE OF NASA OPERATIONS It is a known fact that most of NASAs projects face huge research flaws and take a attractor of effort and financial input to rectify those flaws. For example, the Space Launch system that is currently being worked on has billion dollars and still, there are massive security and sustainability issues popping up that place doubts in the minds of the government as to whether the mission would remain viable or not. Another major sack incurred by NASA was the loss of the Mars Climate Orbiter in 1999 in which $327.6 gazillion was invested for the orbiter and Lander and $193.1 million was invested for spacecraft development. withal, $9 1.7 million and $42.8 million were incurred in launching the mission and operating the activities respectively. This shows that the NASA operations and research efforts, no matter how fair game oriented they are, always carry huge risks that could not be averted at any cost. This, however, can precisely be considered an overgeneralization because the success rate of some of NASAs operations is very high. For example, NASAs launch service program enjoys 98% success rate that is unparalleled. Similarly, the ULA, United Launch Alliance, has made 50 Delta II launches with ascorbic acid% success rate completing a wide array of exceptionally imperative science missions. Also with the long list of accomplishments like those mentioned above,