A&E Television Networks Essay

According to Annie Leibovitz, the picture that was chosen for the cover of the magazine was not by choice or deliberately interpreted. The picture, according to Leibovitz, was only a meter reading. (Leibovitz) However, in the end, it was still chosen to be cover shot for the magazine because of the images candor and unpretentious nature. We all know that John Lennon was a member of The Beatles, one of the greatest music icons of all time.Being a member of quiver band during that time meant adapting a public image or reputation that resound the rock and roll conformation of life, behavior, and attitude, especially because Lennon was extremely famous during that time. However, Leibovitz fritter a focusing of Lennon was far from the established image of a famous musician who just happened to be part of The Beatles. The image was plain and unpretentious in the sense that thither were no heavily implied messages or impressions.Although people would not know who Lennon was really as a person, the picture seemed to portray who he was infinite by fame and stardom. Leibovitz was successfully able to capture a certain air of Lennons honest, intense but tacit strength and influence. Leibovitz ability to bring a certain kind of powerful, individual, distinctive, and honest personality, as reflected in Lennons image, have solidified who she was, as well as her vision and creativity, as an artist and a photographer. The Rise to Fame after(prenominal) two years of working for the Rolling Stone, Leibovitz became the magazines chief photographer. From the simple and realistic image that she took of John Lennon, she was able to go beyond what she knew of picture winning and evolve portrait picture taking into something distinctive and creative. (A&E Television Networks, p. 1) Leibovitz had the liberty to work up and improve her talents, but at the same time deliver photographs that contact on inventiveness and creativity. She began taking glamorous and elaborate im ages as opposed to the simple and lackluster image of Lennon.John Lennon and Yoko Ono Rolling Stone (22 Jan 1981) By Annie Leibovitz The images taken by Leibovitz from then on were bold and modern. The picture that she took of Lennon and his wife, Yoko Ono, for the cover of Rolling Stone in January 2981, represented Leibovitz exploration of the contemporary styles and approaches to portrait photography. Another fall upon feature of Leibovitz works was that the focus is always on different kinds of kinds, personality, and emotions.In this particular image of Lennon and Ono, Leibovitz wanted to bring out the strong ties that bind the two people together as partners. Lennon and Ono also portrayed different roles within the kind of relationship illustrated in the image through body language. Leibovitz saw the aesthesia and vulnerability of Lennon as he clang to Ono, and Onos strength in withstanding the cold. (Leibovitz, 2) The honest and unpretentious element represented in the pi cture was the strong and fixed love or passion between Lennon and Ono.As Leibovitz career advances, her works also become provocative on a grander, larger scale. Some read that Leibovitz photographs were merely image framing the glamour and glitz of a cross between Hollywood and Rock-and-Roll lifestyle as most portraits taken by Leibovitz were extremely forceful and ambitious. (St withals, p. 99) As Leibovitz received criticisms and recognition for her works, the attention on the photographs taken by her escalated, and so did her artistic visions and inspirations.If one would take the most debatable photographs taken by Leibovitz throughout the years of her career, one common theme that brings those images together under a singular theme would be subtle as yet artistic nudity. The existence of nudity in Leibovitz pictures has been one of the primary reasons why her works have received much attention from various groups and individuals, but also the reason why her visions and ins pirations remain to be that of the translation of honesty and regularity through art. C Bette Midler Whoopi Goldberg (1979) (1984)New York Magazine, 1983 The Wall Street Journal, 2008 Coming to Terms with the true(a) Essence of Portrait Photography However, despite the artistic production and radical messages that Leibovitz shot through her photographs, her talents were quickly categorized and judged under provocative images, which were sold and captured attention obviously because of nudity. Leibovitz suddenly realized that there was something amiss from her works and she felt that she lost the ability to capture relationships, real emotions, strong messages, and such in her photographs.She believed that portrait photography should also emphasize the relationship of the undefended to the camera and the photographer in order to produce images that are real and engaging, and not plain and empty. For this reason, Leibovitz stopped working for a month in order to figure out how sh e can improve her craft. (New York Magazine) Narelle Brennan Narelle Brennan As a Showgirl in Las Vegas As a contract with her Two Children (1999) (1999)Women, 1999 Women, 1999 Taking time off work has helped Leibovitz get back on her heels. Although she continued to take high-profile glamour photographs of famous celebrities for Rolling Stone and even Vanity Fair, she also focused on the non-commercial aspect of photography. In one book that Leibovitz and Susan Sontag were able to publish in 1999, she presented the depth of her artistry by taking photographs of real women from different walks of life.In this particular collection, Leibovitz was able to recapture her trademark and style in taking photographs building a relationship between the subject/subjects and the camera and the photographer, building a relationship among the subjects, portraying real and strong emotions, integrating images of power, strength, and influence, reality and simplicity, and personality. From the im ages taken of Narelle Brennan, Leibovitz was able to capture who Brennan was as a person, unbounded by her being simply a showgirl, but also as a mother of two children.The pictures were honest in such a way that it portrayed how the personalities of women change depending on the various roles that they play. Leibovitz successfully depicted freedom, nonconformity, and the need to put down biasness or prejudice when it comes to tagging individuals because of what they do or what they become. Furthermore, she was able to convey her sensitivity in answering for Brennan, that her being a Showgirl in Las Vegas does not stand for her entire person. ConclusionLeibovitz artistry and creativity in photography have evolved through time. One may simply categorize Leibovitz skills and talents as unsettled or inconsistent judging from the diversity of the subjects and themes of the photographs that she has taken over time. However, despite Leibovitz irregular and erratic display of her talents and skills and photography, the changes that she had to see through all those years of building her career as a photographer generally defined her artistry and style.Leibovitz art has certainly improved through time and she was able to take advantage of all the opportunities to take photographs, make mistakes, experiment, and translate drama, emotions, passion, relationships, and such, into photographs, in order to develop her skills and talents as a photographer. Therefore, Leibovitz photography may be defined as flexible or adaptable, but at the same time reprehensible, strong, provocative, and forceful.She understood how the relationship between the subject, the camera, and the photographer should be developed in order to capture genuine emotions and feelings, relationships and connections, and bring out the dominant personalities of her subjects to add meaning to the photograph. The results were timeless and unforgettable images that would resound her inventiveness and adaptabil ity as a photographer.Works CitedA&E Television Networks. Annie Leibovitz Biography. Retrieved from A&E Television Networks. 27 Apr 2009. http//www.nytimes.com/library/photos/leibovitz/brennan.html